On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 21:18 +0000, Rusty via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > > Why do people feel it is risky to develop a large project in D > but not in C++? > Risk aversion and avoidance, conservatism, size of extant installed base of application in the programming language, lack of programmer pool, lack of thinking, "do what we did last time" attitude, sometimes lack of bindings to dependencies, lack of sizable training content, lack of courses in training company portfolio, blind panic about garbage collection, lack of ambition, fear of being different, assumption that you have to do things in C but C++ is acceptable.
I think that main training companies offer C, C++, Go, and even Rust training but not D training is actually a very big issue. […] -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
