On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 17:44:22 UTC, Rainer Schuetze wrote:
You are right about the symbols using the VC mangling. The test case "1.s.s.s.s.s" in the bugreport translated to C++ yields?foo@Result@?1???$s@UResult@?1???$s@UResult@?1???$s <snip>i.e. 936 characters. I think this is due to the very bad limitation of just back referencing the first 10 types.
Unless ? is the proper/valid character those are far more likely to be failed UTF-8 decoding. Care to double check?
