On Friday, 27 May 2016 at 21:25:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 05/27/2016 05:02 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:With the current state of things, I'll just take your word on it.Reasoning is simple - yes we could safely convert to const(char)[] but that means effectively all refcounting is lost for that string. So we can convert but in an explicit manner, e.g. str.toGCThisWillCompletelySuckMan. -- Andrei
not if [] would be ref-counted too ;-)
