On 4 June 2016 at 19:14, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 6/3/2016 4:38 AM, Timon Gehr wrote: >> >> I'm sure there is some syntax that >> will feel natural to D programmers. > > > Aye, there's the rub. Nobody has found one in over 10 years, despite a lot > of discussion.
What is unnatural about 'scope' as has been proposed by heaps of people? I find DIP25 much more awkward and unnatural than 'scope'.