On 6/7/2016 12:07 AM, Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Yes, D is safer than C++, but we were talking about @safe as a specific, advertised, but low-priority and largely unrealized feature, not the general safety of the language. @safe is intended to be a big leap forward, but falls flat outside toys.
I looked over the issues marked 'safe' in bugzilla, and do not understand the complaint that it falls flat and is largely unrealized. There are holes in it, sure, but they do not take away from what is covered, which is quite a bit.
This minimization and deflection of real user feedback is rather disappointing and somewhat insulting. Instead, I'd prefer to see acceptance that it's an actual issue and not hand waved away as not really a problem of current, real, users.
I cannot do anything with handwaving statements, whether I accept them and hang my head in shame or not. Although I may have missed some, or some may not be tagged properly, I found only one bugzilla issue from you tagged 'safe':
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13607 Here is the complete list of issues tagged with 'safe': https://issues.dlang.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&keywords=safe&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=208819&query_format=advanced Writing up specifically what problems you're having would be most appreciated.
