Re: size_t vs uintptr_t

[Guillaume Boucher via Digitalmars-d]

I was referring to this diff in the pull linked request:

-private size_t _alignUp(size_t alignment)(size_t n)
+private uintptr_t _alignUp(uintptr_t alignment)(uintptr_t n)

size_t is the correct type.  There is no reason to change it.