On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 19:27:36 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 18:50:25 UTC, Enamex wrote:
Also, C++17 is 'getting' Modules and Concepts Lite later in
tech specs... that don't even have working drafts according to
this [https://isocpp.org/std/status] (but have experimental
implementations in Clang and VC++, at least).
Modules is not part of C++17, it is on a separate track.
Concepts are also not part of C++17.
Maybe it would be a good idea to not complain so much about
languages you guys don't know much about. I suggest focusing
on making D better instead.
That's what I said. They're not in the C++17 spec but we won't be
waiting for C++Next for them, hopefully.
And I complained about nothing; and know little about _any_
language; still so much to learn.
