Re: Walter: D asm syntax not consistent nor calling convention with C++

[Adam Sansier via Digitalmars-d]

I should point out that the code still doesn't work. It simply 
doesn't crash. It seems to jump to another code location that 
fails silently. I might not be fixing up the stack frame 
correctly or or doing something D expects. Hard to no because 
when I try to step over the `call` instruction it ends up in 
limbo in another part of the code so I can't check the return 
state to even see if it passed. I guess EIP is getting thrashed. 
Regardless, just further proves something is wrong with D as C++ 
works exactly as it should no matter how the function is called.