On Wed, 03 Aug 2016 20:30:07 +0000, deadalnix wrote: > On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:38:33 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta wrote: >> I support this idea of extending curly-brace initializers. It would be >> very useful and less ambiguous than parenthesized initializers. >> >> > Curly braces are already extremely overloaded. They can start a block > statement, a delegate literal, a struct literal and I'm sure I forgot > something.
q{} strings.
