On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:28:05 +0100, Don wrote: > I think this is quite horrible. [1, 2, 3] looks like an array literal, > but it isn't -- it's an array constructor. It doesn't look like a > function call. It shouldn't be.
I've hit the problem around four times last week in combination with C bindings. I agree with the proposal, but I miss action.
