On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 23:58:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Monday, 15 August 2016 at 20:43:59 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
It's not trolling (unless you define trolling as "everything
that goes againt my position"), I just exposed my arguments.
I'm afraid to see people overreacting in front of a minor and
temporary problem. It seems that 3 or 4 posts are considered
enough to act but you (the "pro-certificate-ppl") do not try
to see why 3 or 4 posts could be "not enough"), i.e you are
biased. You are about to act just because of what's happening
right now.
Is there some threshold for a bug report to be considered
actionable? Aside from that, given that a small percentage of D
users actually post in the forums, four posts on the same issue
is something that ought to be taken as a problem. There's no
way to know how many have encountered it and just decided to go
elsewhere. It's not about being "pro-certificate", but about
solving a problem that's potentially damaging to the perception
of D.
Ok ok ok. It's been something like three hours I've been thinking
to this.
Clearly I've exposed my **own POV** about some stuff I don't like
about what Windows is becoming. But for the good of everybody
(i.e I forget my own little griefs) that would be certainly nice
to have a certificate for the D fundation. But it won't change
the fact that once setup quitely thanks to the certificate...the
language and standard libraries issues are still there ;)