On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 01:28:05 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
for x86 dmd, the results are: 0m0.694s 0m1.176s 0m0.722s 0m1.454s x86_64 codegen looks... not normal.
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 at 01:28:05 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
for x86 dmd, the results are: 0m0.694s 0m1.176s 0m0.722s 0m1.454s x86_64 codegen looks... not normal.