On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 22:24:12 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
I can't wrap my head around the fact that a library template called by my module cannot see my private members.
Well, it was never possible to access them either, didn't seem to cause much confusion. Also getSymbolsByUDA is built on a hack around that access check https://github.com/dlang/phobos/blob/cb09746cb11bcbe7b730f05d29792e6252669175/std/traits.d#L6979. Note that you can pass private symbols to templates, so `hasUDA!(S.invisible, UDA)` works fine. I don't see any other examples where we'll have much issues with that change other than w/ this weird getSymbolsByUDA API, which aliases to !(S.field, S.func, S.Nested). Most templates operating on wholes types already didn't have access to private members.
