Bill Baxter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Lutger <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Justin Johansson wrote: >> >>> No, sorry I am not informed on D's policy about warnings >> >> Exactly. Ever wondered why that is? >> >> The policy is: there are no warnings. > > Probably more clear to say "all warnings are treated as errors." > > --bb
Note there is no way to treat warnings as warnings, making those 'warnings' just errors that can be turned on or off. Since there are no warnings to begin with, there are no warnings to treat as errors. I think that better reflects the idea that according to Walter, the concept of a compiler warning is inherently broken and thus rejected. Your code either compiles or not, which goes against the idea of what warnings are.
