On 2 October 2016 at 21:40, rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 03/10/2016 12:37 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> module x.a; >> >> class A >> { >> package: >> int f() >> { >> return 0; >> } >> } >> >> >> ============================ >> module x.b; >> >> import x.a; >> >> class B : A >> { >> package: >> override int f() >> { >> return 0; >> } >> } >> >>> error : function x.b.B.f package method is not virtual and cannot >>> override >> >> >> Why? I have a UI system with modules for each node type. UI internal >> stuff is naturally 'package'. Virtuals are perfectly reasonable within >> a package. > > > I would recommend using the explicit form of package ``package(x):`` > although no idea if that'll help you out here.
It makes no difference. (I actually do use this form).