On 8 October 2016 at 23:28, Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On Saturday, 8 October 2016 at 13:06:42 UTC, Manu wrote: >> >> On 7 October 2016 at 18:09, Ethan Watson via Digitalmars-d >> <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 01:57:06 UTC, Manu wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Regarding 'Linear.No'... yeah... I dunno. I've had this argument before. >>>> I really hate that pattern. If it's required, I'll do it >>> >>> >>> >>> At least as far as readability goes, explicit parameterisation lets you >>> understand the invocation at a glance rather than already knowing the actual >>> name of the parameter or having to go elsewhere in code to see the >>> prototype. For a library, I'd favor readability. >> >> >> Oh no, you too? >_< >> Incidentally, have you had a geez over the core API? An efficient API >> will emerge when we work out how to work batched operations into >> ranges... > > > I like true/false here :-)
I like this guy ;)