On 10/10/2016 3:20 PM, jython234 wrote:
I've tracked it down to two lines (which are the same):

private SyncLock lock = new SyncLock();

SyncLock is just an empty class which I use to construct objects for use in
"synchronized" blocks (not sure if this is the right way to do this). Apparently
if I move the initialization to the constructor there are no linker errors.

You can use obj2asm to examine the object files to see what is different between the two cases.

Reply via email to