On Friday, 4 November 2016 at 14:10:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/3/16 6:29 PM, Jerry wrote:

So I was thinking of a way of extending if statements that have
declarations. The following being as example of the current use of if
statements with declarations:

    if(int* weDontPollute = someFunc())
    {
         // use weDontPollute
    }

That's great and all, but it only works by checking if the variable evaluates to true or false. Which is fine for a pointer but otherwise useless for anything else, like integers where zero is usually valid input (index for array). So currently the only way to do something like this in the language, that i've found, is to use a for statement.

    for(int i = someFunc(); i >= 0;)
    {
        // use i

        break;
    }

Not that ideal to use a for statement. It makes it hard to read and if the break condition isn't there it might very well be an infinite loop.
So I was thinking of some sort of syntax like this:

    if(int i = someFunc(); i >= 0)
    {
        // use i
    }
Thoughts on this sort of feature?


Hm... what about something like:

struct BoolCond(T, string cond)
{
   T val;
   bool opCast(B)() if(is(B == bool))
   {
     return mixin("val " ~ cond);
   }
}

auto boolcond(string cond, T)(T val)
{
   return BoolCond!(T, cond)(val);
}

if(auto i = someFunc.boolcond!(">= 0"))
{
   ... // use i
}

-Steve

Well that's just a basic case, what if you want more than one condition. Using "&&" for example, or a condition along with another value that's in the scope.

void otherFunc(int input)
{
    if(auto i = someFunc.boolcond!(">= input")) // --- error
    {
       ... // use i
    }
}

Then you need another work around for something like this:

if(int value; auto i = someFunc(&value))
{
   // ...
}


Reply via email to