On Wednesday, 23 November 2016 at 13:35:33 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
1. Current default RNG (Mt19937) has not state for the latest
value.
That's a detail of your implementation, though, and it's not true
for lots of other pseudo-RNGs.
2. The structure is allocated on stack and compilers can
recognise loop patterns and eliminate addition memory movements
for many cases.
Fair enough. I'm still not sure, though, why you would object to
providing public methods for pseudo-RNGs to (i) update the
internal state and (ii) access the most recently generated
variate, which the `opCall` would then wrap.
