Re: A simple solution for randomness copy problem

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 11:29:25 UTC, Joseph Rushton 
Wakeling wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 at 08:50:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
        if (isSaturatedRandomEngine!G)

Question on your terminology here: while saturated makes sense, 
is it really your intention to restrict things to random 
_engines_ (i.e. pseudo-random algorithms)?  Surely it should 
also be possible for this functionality to work with random 
devices?

Of course they can work with random devices. It looks strange to 
me to have explicit  API difference between engines and devices. 
A random devices can be marked as random engines or we can add a 
simple generic adaptor (Device->Engine) for them. --Ilya

I will be happy to se your PR for random devices to mir-random.

Thanks,
Ilya