Re: Multiple return value as requirements for safety and performance

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:28:49 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:

On Tuesday, 20 December 2016 at 17:15:53 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:

Are they already CTFEable? I have not seen an anounce, sorry

They have been for years now.
Of course only pointers from a CTFE context are valid at ctfe.

The new engine will support them as well, (as it will eventually support everything with the exception of 80bit reals)

Thanks!
Sorry for the noise!