On Friday, 23 December 2016 at 22:11:31 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:

enum SIZE = 100000000;

void foo(int* a, int* b) {
    int* atop = a + 1000; // should be `a + SIZE`, right?
    ptrdiff_t offset = b - a;
    for (; a < atop; ++a)
        *a &= *(a + offset);
}

This code is not equivalent with the plain foreach loop. Execution is different when a > (size_t.max-SIZE). Thus the "ptrdiff" loop cannot be vectorized (or can only be vectorized when guarded with a check for potential overflow first).
LDC:
https://godbolt.org/g/YcCJdZ
(note the funny jmp .LBB1_6 to a ret instruction... what's that?!)

GDC does something more complex:
https://godbolt.org/g/3XeI9p

Just for info. Don't know which is faster, but I'm guessing the vectorized foreach loop.

Reply via email to