On Nov 17, 09 23:44, Ellery Newcomer wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Ellery Newcomer, el 16 de noviembre a las 19:02 me escribiste:
Justin Johansson wrote:
Great. Sounds like problem solved in that there is no problem.
So how do people feel about bill's suggestion to progress the issue
further?
Be good to get some comments from higher-up (Walter, Andrei)?
Predict bearophile will chime in on this one too?
The real problem is you'd end up with a tuple syntax identical to a
valid c syntax. If D silently accepts it, but does something different,
it's a no go.
Code ported from C should not compile if the comma expression is converted
to a tuple literal because if a and b are int, typeof(a,b) is int now and
will be Tuple!(int, int) in the future, and I don't think
a Tuple!(anything) could be implicitly casted to anything, except, maybe,
another tuple, but you don't have tuples in C, so there is no risk on that.
void fun1(int a);
void fun1(Tuple!(int,int) a);
fun1( (a=fizbang(), a+b) );
These are not code ported from *C*.
