On Friday, 17 February 2017 at 04:13:06 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
This is based on conversations I've had with Andrei and Walter on here and on Github.

There was a bunch of threads here about six months ago by Andrei talking about the different problems he was running into when trying to implement @safe and @nogc containers. One of the conclusions was that ref counting was going to have to be a nessesary component of the solution. This led to DIP1000 because of Andrei's conclusion that "Safe reference counting cannot be implemented as a library" https://forum.dlang.org/post/n0nnu0$1tth$1...@digitalmars.com.

Also, there's the vision document, which lays out some goals but does not talk about containers: https://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2017H1

Excellent, thanks for sharing this.  --Jon

Reply via email to