On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 at 20:00:54 UTC, aberba wrote:
From a technical and experience point of view (those with experience in large D code-base), how is only D's GC & optional MMM a significant production-use blocker?
This is mostly a psychological effect of C++ folks having aversion to any GC.
(To make my problem clear, how is D's current state not going to allow / make it so difficult for developers (who know what they are doing) to write say Photoshop-scale software: excluding those *so* realtime use cases?)
I don't think there's really a problem there. Although not quite Photoshop-scale, but these video and photo processing apps were made in D without any problems:
http://www.infognition.com/VideoEnhancer/ http://www.infognition.com/blogsort/ (and they aren't even @nogc)
