On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 14:19:17 UTC, Traktor TOni wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 12:23:11 UTC, Ethan Watson wrote:
On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 11:25:11 UTC, Traktor TOni wrote:
I think the name is just misleading, the D developers should
at least be honest with themselves.
D++ - Because no language has version numbers. Not even C#.
Any proof to the contrary is clearly fake proof.
I am not sure what this has anything to do with version
numbers? My point is that D is much more like C++ than it is
like C, I think D should be honest and reflect that in its
name. That's all I'm saying.
So should Java be renamed to Java++? Or maybe D should be
D-Java++?