On Sunday, 26 March 2017 at 10:43:11 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
As you see from the above example D mangles the getClassConst as a "Class const * const" instead of a "Class const *" ("YAQEBV" vs "YAPEBV"). Is this expected behavior?
It's consistent. D's const is transitive, and D doesn't allow you to specify const on the indirection of a reference type. So there is no problem on the C++ mangling side of things, but, arguably, there is one in D's sementic, that isn't new.
Something like differentiating "const(C) i" and "const C i" may be a good idea.
