On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:04:28 +0000, ixid wrote: > Why is it harmful (actually asking, not telling you you're wrong)? I > thought we were going to use a pay for what you use philosophy, if a > unit test is not run then why is it paid for?
A person that doesn't run `dmd -unittest` (or `dub test`) prior to committing code could commit broken tests. In my mind if you write tests but don't run them, they're broken anyway. --Ryan