I know people her do not like to see proposals that change (add stuff to) the language. However, I strongly feel that for the testing purposes D should provide means to patch any object (no matter whether it is final or not!). Therefore I wonder what people think of adding a `patch(obj) {}` or perhaps change the semantics of the `with(obj) {}` so unittest writers can modify the object and set values.

The patch keyword would work ONLY inside unittest {} blocks AND inside functions annotated with @test annotation.

Imagine we have:

int myFun(Person person) { /* some logic here */ }

unittest {
auto p = new Person() /* does not really matter which constructor we use */
  patch(p) {
// here we can modify ANY attribute, no matter whether it is private or public
    p.fname = "Nikola"
    p.sname = "Tesla"
  }
  auto res = myFun(p)
  // do some assertions here
}

Similarly:

@test
void test_myFun() {
  // same code as in the unittest above.
}

I do not even know if patch() {} statement is even possible, that is the whole point of writing this, so people can enlighten me... :)

As I said in the introduction paragraph, for this purpose the semantics of the with statement could be changed, but I prefer a different keyword (patch) to be honest.

Reply via email to