Re: Exceptions in @nogc code

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 5 April 2017 at 09:48:47 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
   try { ... }
   catch (owned Exception e) { ... }
   catch (scope Exception e) { ... }
   catch (Exception e) { ... }
It not look enticing.

You can do that, but that's 100% equivalent to:

   try { ... }
   catch (scope Exception e) { ... }

Unless you want to do something specific with the owned case ? 
You seems to be under the impression that this does anything 
specific for catch/throw when it doesn't.

Today, you can do

try { ... }
catch(immutable(Exception) e) { ... }

There is nothing different here.