On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 12:11:10 UTC, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 22:36:39 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
All the regression fixes and none of the bugs!
The current situation is that it should be link-compatible
with current upstream/stable. Enough so that when someone has
the time to test, it should just be a case switching the
sources and building the D version.
First of all, thank you for your tremendous work on GDC! Fellow
developers and me were also pretty stunned by you maintaining a
quite large amount of different GDC versions in parallel
without a huge team - that's some impressive work!
What is the thing that's blocking GDCs GCC inclusion? Just
manpower? Also, you were talking about "bugs" on several
occasions, what's the thing with that? Is it GCC or general
Phobos bugs? It would probably be awesome to have a summary
blogpost or similar on the state of GDC, that could potentially
also attract volunteers.
Anyway, all a bit off-topic :-)
I assume the bugs would be DMDFE bugs.
Iain is giving talk at DConf on GDC
(http://dconf.org/2017/talks/buclaw.html) which should help.
