On Tuesday, 18 April 2017 at 06:54:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2017-04-17 21:28, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
The page could also list pre-approved language
changes such as async functions (which Walter wants afaik).
Another feature that can be implemented with AST macros. This
is starting to get ridicules. So many features have been added
and are talked about that can be implemented with AST macros
instead. Same as with the scope/safe related DIPs. Many
smallish specialized features are added instead of a generic
feature that can handle all of them. Increasing the complexity
of the language.
The corresponding ast-macros would be extremely complex, slow and
worst of all not checkable.
