On 24 April 2017 at 18:36, Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Monday, 24 April 2017 at 04:21:36 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> Now, I'm not saying that rval references are the only solution here, just >> that I can overload the construction from an X for the rvalue and >> non-rvalue case, which is what I want... >> > > What I've done in the past is simply to create a movable_ref pointer-type. > AFAICT that would be similar to C++ "&&" except it isn't downgraded when > used as a parameter (which is a language feature). C++ provide that > downgrading so that programmers don't accidentally forward a reference as a > movable reference without making it explicit. > I've done that too, but that's a seriously shit solution. You didn't comment on any of my actual questions ;)
