On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no constructor is in the derived class.
I agree.
Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d Tue, 02 May 2017 11:07:06 -0700
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Ro... Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Revie... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Revie... Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Revie... Basile B. via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Ro... Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Ro... Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Revie... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Ro... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Revie... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary R... Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Prelimina... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Prel... Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 ... Mike Wey via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 ... Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Round 1 Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Ro... deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Revie... Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
- Re: DIP 1004 Preliminary Review Ro... Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d
