On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no constructor is in the derived class.
I agree.
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d Tue, 02 May 2017 11:07:06 -0700
On Tuesday, 2 May 2017 at 09:03:27 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
100% in favor of the constructor behavior change in case no constructor is in the derived class.
I agree.