On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 10:28:09 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 15 May 2017 at 01:18:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, while I do like the idea of getting the word body back as
an identifier, what really appeals to me here is getting rid
of the need for it with contracts. And using function instead
of body doesn't help that at all.
The purpose of the DIP is to reclaim the keyword. If you want
shorter contracts, then:
int f(int a)
in assert(a>0)
out(r) assert(b==a+1)
{
return a+1;
}
Yes, please keep the discussion focused on the the removal of
`body` and how to best go about that. I do agree though that we
could and should make contracts shorter. Maybe in another DIP
after this one.
