On Sunday, 21 May 2017 at 13:08:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
foo!(x)!y
I think it's the same as foo!x!y. As for the reason - I think because the order is possibly ambiguous or something? You could interpret it as either (foo!x)!y or foo!(x!y).
Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d Sun, 21 May 2017 06:47:17 -0700
On Sunday, 21 May 2017 at 13:08:18 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
foo!(x)!y
I think it's the same as foo!x!y. As for the reason - I think because the order is possibly ambiguous or something? You could interpret it as either (foo!x)!y or foo!(x!y).