Yigal Chripun wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Would love to trim the book as well. My finger is on the Del button.
Just say a word.
Unless someone comes up with "I really need field names", dump 'em
(but save a backup of your work first!).
My RIP emails to you (as with typedef) are my backup. Don't delete
them :o).
So, C-style arrays are gone, C-style struct initializers are gone,
typedef is gone. __traits isn't feeling too well either :o).
Andrei
what about foreach_reverse ?
FWIW iota is written to work better with retro on floating-point numbers
than foreach_reverse. However, it does one addition and one
multiplication per iteration; foreach_revers only does one addition. The
multiplication, however, gives iota precise semantics.
Andrei
