We now have struct constructors that do basically the same thing as a static opCall. Non-static opCall should still be ok, for implementing functors, but I think having static opCall is just too confusing given struct literals / struct constructors.
Right now struct S; S(1,2) ; could be 1) a static opCall, 2) a constructor call 3) a struct literal That seems too many things sharing the same syntax to me. --bb
