On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:18:21AM +0300, ketmar via Digitalmars-d wrote: > Ozan wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 09:44:55 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote: > > > Is there an issue with the tests? Surprised that vibe.d is not > > > higher in the rating... > > > > > > https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r14&hw=ph&test=fortune > > > > > Same for me. > > I used a lot of Java (Jetty, Tomcat) and Groovy (Grails) stuff > > before using D (vibe.d). > > On my machine I got a factor of 10-50 in difference. Vibe.d was > > always much faster. > > > > So where are the results coming from? > > most of it came from microbenchmarking. "how fast can we parse json > and query db?" wow, what a great benchmark! surely, we don't need to > do any data processing, let's measure raw speed of parsing data, and > then throwing it away!
Yes, data processing performance is not important; parsing is what we must optimize! T -- A program should be written to model the concepts of the task it performs rather than the physical world or a process because this maximizes the potential for it to be applied to tasks that are conceptually similar and, more important, to tasks that have not yet been conceived. -- Michael B. Allen