On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 19:16:07 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 19:10:26 UTC, Ozan wrote:
On Wednesday, 7 June 2017 at 17:51:30 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hi guys
I made a small video.
Mature and heavily optimized C library vs. young D upstart.
See for yourself how it turns out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOeVftcVsvI
Cheers,
Stefan
Great. I like it (not the color of the terminal font -
green!!! ;-)
What is the cause for different benchmark results (from 30us
up to 48us)?
With your small number lines, do you implement the complete
sqlite functionality?
Regards, Ozan
It's the Matrix-Movie green ;)
I only implement reading the file format.
And a few convenience functions for finding a table, iterating
by rows, and extracting columns.
The cause for the different results it like the scheduling of
the OS.
Since we do issue quite a large read before iterating.
most of our time-slice has been used.
which makes it possible for us to get swapped out during
processing.
I see, Matrix style. Red or blue pill, that's the question. ;-)
Your sqlite-d solution would be complete if writing sqlite files
are also possible. Ignore the SQL parsing stuff, it does not fit
in a world of fast data processing.
Regards Ozan
