Re: Expressing range constraints in CNF form

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 6/10/2017 5:28 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

     && is(typeof(lvalueOf!R.popFront)) && msg("must support back");

Wouldn't it work better as:

    && (is(typeof(lvalueOf!R.popFront)) || msg("must support back"));

    bool msg(string) { return false; }

? Then msg() is only called if the first clause fails.