On Wednesday, 21 June 2017 at 16:23:53 UTC, MysticZach wrote:
void foo()
{
int bar(Args...)(Args args)
if (Args.length > 2)
in (args[0] != 0)
in (args[1] > 1)
out /*whoops, forgot `( )`*/(result) { ... }
do { ... }
while (true); // Error: while statement cannot contain just
`;`
}
Honestly this doesn't seem like a big deal, as I'd imagine it'd
be hard not to notice that code like this wasn't working as
expected. And also extremely rare. So I'm still in favor.
I see. Well, I would only see that as an issue if it would
compile and then generate code that differs from what one
intended. But since it errors out, I don't see a problem, either,
though it would be best to enhance that error message to give a
hint that the programmer may have triggered that ambiguous case
by accident. Something like "Did you mean `out() (result)`?"
