On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:14:41AM +0300, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On 6/29/2017 10:19 PM, Random D user wrote: > > I just got curious, after reading the GC analysis blog post. What > > kind of features people generally would want for the GC (in the > > distant murky future of 1999)? > > > > Here's some of my nice to haves: > > > > 1. Thread local GCs. D is by default thread local, so it kind of > > would make sense and goodbye stop everything GC. > > Yes, yes and yes. The moment we fix the spec and code that casts > shared to TLS at will.
Hmm. I'm not familiar with the intricacies of shared; could you elaborate on how casting from shared causes problems with a thread-local GC? Or is the problem casting *from* shared? T -- Gone Chopin. Bach in a minuet.