On 11.07.2017 09:50, Daniel N wrote:
On Monday, 10 July 2017 at 08:53:42 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
As promised, since there has been zero feedback on DIP 1010, "Static
foreach", in either the Draft or Preliminary review rounds, I'm going
to skip the normal two-week feedback cycle on the Formal review. If
there are no major criticisms or objections raised in this thread,
then sometime on Thursday of this week I'll send Walter & Andrei an
email kicking off the decision process.
So, if you have any thoughts on the DIP, now is the time to express them.
Thanks!
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1010.md
how is __local handled with nested static foreach?
The following code works:
---
static foreach(i;0..4){
static if(i) __local alias outerPrevious = __previous;
static foreach(j;0..4){
static if(i&&j){
pragma(msg, outerPrevious.i," ",__previous.j);
}
}
}
---
It prints:
---
0 0
0 1
0 2
1 0
1 1
1 2
2 0
2 1
2 2
---
(However, note that DIP 1010 does not propose adding __local to the
language.)
