On Friday, 28 July 2017 at 00:20:25 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 27 July 2017 at 23:27:53 UTC, Nicholas Wilson
wrote:
Might be useful to mention why not included.
This DIP focuses on function (i.e. @-like attributes), the
rest of those attributes are storage classes/visibility
classes or parametric in a way that doesn't fit with this DIP
(extern(C++, A.B), package(foo) align(N).
So then you might make that more clear, such as by re-titling
it "Function Attributes" instead of "Attributes" and change
language in certain locations, like in the abstract, to refer
to function attributions specifically instead of all attributes.
Thats a good idea.
