On 10/3/2017 12:58 AM, Enamex wrote:
I couldn't find anything focused on D's overloading resolution scheme (or anything with the specific term "reverse operand lookup"). Can you elaborate?
See my reply to Timon.
Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors?
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:31:08 -0700
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for... Manu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b`... Wyatt via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we ad... Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we ad... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we ad... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b`... Manu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b`... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b`... Enamex via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vec... jmh530 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? tn via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Should we add `a * b` for vectors? John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
