On Friday, 6 October 2017 at 19:51:39 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
No, under my thinking the original example should have been what it was. Enclosing an expression in an additional set of parentheses does not change its semantics. This is true even if one set of parentheses is part of the function call.
Hmm, I hadn't realized that you can have multiple sets of parentheses without error. I was assuming you would treat the second set as a tuple.
