Re: Deprecate implicit `int` to `bool` conversion for integer literals

[Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 12 November 2017 at 16:57:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
The overload being called depends on (a) whether a - b can be 
computed during compilation or not, and (b) the actual value of 
a - b. Clearly a big problem for modular code. This is the 
smoking gun motivating the DIP.

An very similar problem exists for int and char overloads:
alias foo = (char c) => 1;
alias foo = (int i) => 4;

enum int e = 7;
static assert(foo(e) == 4); // fails