On Friday, 22 December 2017 at 13:38:25 UTC, Dan Partelly wrote:
It works as a "betterC" it seems, but you loose a lot of
functionality which should be in a "better C" and again, a lot
from the standard libraries is lost. Template C++ 2017 works
well for a better C as well, and I retain 0 cost abstraction,
decent (yet inferior to D meta-programming), closures,
exceptions, scopes...
It seems that there's an effort from the top to bring more higher
level features into --betterC. I agree with you that more should
be there, that it should really be betterC++ and strive for
feature parity with modern C++.
