On 02/08/2018 10:06 PM, Timothee Cour wrote:
/"EOC This is a multi-line heredoc comment allowing /+ documented unittests containing nesting comments +/
That shouldn't be an issue as long as you're using /++ doc comments and not /** ones. If it IS a problem, I'd regard it as a bug.
(If I were in change of the world, /** and /* both would be compiler errors, banned from all commits, and non-nesting block comments of all types would be prohibited from all langauges upon pain of...well, pain. They are spawn of satan and should never exist.)
and weird urls like https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq.html
*That* is a compelling point: Any embedded langauge (such as URL syntax) where +/ is valid. That, and maybe any code examples or discussions which, for any reason, intentially involve an unmatched end-of-comment.
